Credit: The Independent (AFP) |
So here we find ourselves again amongst the chaos, with even
more lunacy and ill thought out policy being brought into the stream of public
consciousness by this hap-hazard government. I’ve tried to hold back my extremity
of language on the reservation that I don’t want to come across as undermining. I believe in times of deep public crisis, the best approach is to helpfully
point out errors or areas for improvement without being the brandishing hand that
slaps those in control with such brazen ideological firmness. However, the sheer
half-baked perception of public opinion via the pushing through of the dreaded
Immigration Bill has got me thinking if Boris and the gang have really thought
about if they want to keep any sort of majority in four years’ time.
Priti Patel sure is tough isn’t she? Or at least she’d
have us believe that her toughness will extend to the tightening up of border
controls on either side of The Channel to avoid
migrants entering the UK illegally during the period of lockdown.
Whatever your views may be on illegal immigration (which I’m sure will vary among
my extremely limited readership), I can assure you that 550
migrants turning up on a dinghy at the White Cliffs of Dover is most
certainly not the primary focus of this Immigration Bill despite a certain
division of the public wanting it to be (I assure you I only link The Sun to
demonstrate who will connect this bill to asylum law as the most central issue).
Whilst this type of illegal immigration is an issue that warrants attention in
its own right, I will not be dealing with it in relation to the Immigration Bill
as legislation on how the asylum process will be reformed is extremely far down
the pipeline (on Patel’s
own admission) and is not at all pressing in comparison to the central implications
of the bill at this precise moment.
Priti Patel could have been pressured just that bit more by Nick Ferrari on LBC (video still) |
Whilst there is not presently much information on bill
specifics, what we do know is that we’ll be embracing the oxymoron that by closing up the free movement of EEA citizens, we will be opening up our
borders to the world. This means the current EEA regulations dictating free
movement of migrants around the EEA area will end and all those who now wish to
enter the UK will have to do it either on the Points-based system or on a settlement route. Of course,
if you are unable to find a British spouse to get your feet on English soil
then it’ll have to be the PBS-system which is the prime reason for confusion
and uproar in light of the new bill.
Let’s be clear, the PBS system is nothing new as many
gun toting Australiaphiles have harped on about during the Brexit referendum. Being
in force for non-EEA migrants since 2010, the system has several routes, sectioned
into Tiers. Now most people won’t be coming in as minted investors or
exceptional talents under Tier 1, and Tier 3 has been suspended since its implementation
due to the fact it was drafted to account for mass low-skilled labour shortages
if an abundance of workers were ever required (funny that). So, that leaves us
with the most frequently used visa tiers: Tier 2 for overseas migrant
workers, Tier 4 for students and Tier 5 for anyone else (Tier 5 is a reasonably niche category and will be mentioned in more detail at the foot of this article with regards to touring musicians).
The so far silently operating Tier 2 (General) route has now
finally taken centre stage and has revealed itself in all of its civil service jargon that has not only shown how the government determines who is able to
come and work in the UK from overseas but perhaps how the everyday jobs we
carry out are perceived by the powers that be. To be as brief as possible
without getting lumped down in technicalities of the Immigration Rules, to be
hired under the Tier 2 (General) category is no easy feat. One must have the
relevant skills required for the high-skilled role as set out in the list of jobs
eligible for this route and meet the specified salary shown on the same
list as well as lots of other bureaucratic processes, fees and documents. In
accordance with the policy
statement, the bill will likely relax this “high-skilled” list to
include a whole load more roles that currently do not quality under the Tier 2
route, resulting in perhaps more non-EEA immigration. However, the
government have been a clear as day on their approach to low-skilled workers
where there will be no exceptions. Click
here and select the “Table 5” drop-down option for the list of all
roles deemed as low-skilled to see for yourself how these terms are defined and
exampled in the Immigration Rules (I would strongly encourage you to
view this section of the Immigration Rules and spend some time trawling though
just how many jobs are understood as low-skilled).
Matt Vickers in the Commons giving a no nonsense speech on ending free-movement |
So far, so good? The borders are being loosened as oppose to
restricted and the government is still able to follow through with getting
Brexit done on perhaps the single most crucial motivator in the Leave camp,
immigration. A “firmer, fairer and simpler system.” However, In the words of
Nick Ferrari, the world has changed (see the previously linked YouTube video). Migration from EEA countries has
steadily increased since 2004 with over a million
EEA migrants (Table 3, ‘Largest Occupations by Skill Group and Place of
Birth’) taking up “low-skilled” roles currently. Since the impact of Covid-19,
the British public have endured a reassessment of values of which skills have
been the most dependable in keeping our lives moving day in day out. Unlike the
pre-corona consensus, the corona enduring world has seen before their very eyes
which sectors have been neglected (most notably care workers, who you will find
on the low-skilled list) and the risks people are willing to put themselves
through when carrying out their employment duties. In other words, by the
choice of the British people, we have recognised the low-skilled as being essentially
vital to our economy in current circumstances. Conservative MP for Stockton
South, Matt Vickers asserted in the Commons that this new system will allow us
to effectively select who is most useful to our economy by ending free movement
but the situation indicates that a great deal of the most useful have
been entering on none other than free movement regulations.
The silver bullet in the pushing forth of the Immigration Bill
is not what it contains but is found purely its timing at a more delicate time
than ever. A debate about British workers filling low-skilled roles through a
phasing in scheme to adequately make up the EEA deficit can and should be had
but not right now. It would seem Priti Patel is still on a full throttle beaming
of Brexit floodlights which has only exposed her detachment from contemporary
public opinion by still believing the public is driven by a “tightening up” of infinite
inbound European migration. I can imagine her logic goes something like
this: “If I push this through now, I will show the public how tough I am on the
issue; how committed the Conservative party are to their election promises and
will appeal to the “get-on-with-it” attitude harboured by much of the
Conservative electorate with regards to the Coronavirus.” What bringing this
bill to the forefront of debate has in fact done is open many people’s eyes to
the how a PBS immigration system really functions. Low-skilled in terms of the
Immigration Rules does not only include a lot of jobs but now British
citizens themselves will think twice about how their government views British
jobs resulting in a redefining of the terms “high-skilled” and “low-skilled”
and how they now apply to a society under siege of infection.
Fruit pickers in Hereford Credit: Bloomberg via Getty Images |
The government have been relaxed in allowing EEA migrants to
fill the low-skilled labour market for years, just look at the fruit picking story
to see the EU migrant support network that we often fall back onto in clinch
moments. Even the Tier 3 visa category was suspended upon implementation on the
basis that mainly freely moving EEA migrants will always be able to cover a
deficit of low-skilled workers. It would seem the low-skilled are now those who
are most valuable in our predicament with the Immigration Bill only making us
aware of the spite directed at this labour group by our government. Coronavirus
has indeed become the elixir enabling us to view our comrades in a different
light on all sorts of issues. That light has now been steered toward fellow
European citizens and the contributions they have made since their arrival in
our land. What the Conservative party don’t realise, is that by firing on all
pistons to keep a promise to the public, they are preaching to the converted,
except this mob of converts are those of a new faith entirely.
On a slightly related note
There has been some talk in the DIY music community about
changes to concert performances and tours in that of non-UK artists touring or
performing in the UK. In an NME
article it was suggested that the policy will require Tier 5 performance
visas to be made to play in the UK. The implications to our community are not
too drastic in scenario where a band comes into the UK on a visit visa and
plays maybe one or two shows with borrowed equipment. Even larger US bands who
may be on booking agencies are still required to apply for similar visa types
when undergoing a more high budget tour but this is usually sorted out by the
booking agent and won’t be too different to how things currently stand for
groups being big enough to have to make these types of applications.
My main concerns are twofold:
- EU bands will now be faced with the Tier 5 route which will provide solid barriers to a fluidity of movement enjoyed by a whole European hardcore scene (including the UK) for many years. It is pretty common practice these days for European bands to drive freely around their continent annually/biannually with no limits on logistical arrangements. In short, you can mostly definitely expect European bands to be touring with UK bands less and hitting the UK as a location on their route even less often.
- There still isn’t at all much clarity on how the EU will take to UK bands touring the mainland. If they choose to implement a similar system to what we are imposing on them then every single logistical nightmare of booking a tour will become ten times worse. Bands will scrabble around to gather funds for visa fees, documentary evidence and whatever else comes with the tediousness of visa applications. Those who wish to take the change can still always fly into Europe with NOTHING and borrow all their stuff as many have done so when touring the US but believe me, this requires an infinitely more careful touring plan on where merch is printed and where vans/gear is collected from etc. This creates a direct dependence for UK bands to tour alongside a European act as British bands will require the unlucky European sods who opt to tour with them as those responsible for arranging all the aforementioned logistics when meeting the British band at the airport. This directly contravenes the current trend which is for two UK bands to team up in a van and hit the EU coast line with a shared boot of equipment.
Ultimately, none of this will stop people from either
following the rules or finding ways around them but you can bet your bottom dollar
that frequency will decline and less international acts will head to British
shores. A good time to become nationalistic champions of our own acts for sure
but I really do accept this begrudgingly as at the end of the day, hardcore and
punk are international phenomena that prosper most when exposed to audiences
across borders.
Two bands in one photo (Blind Authority and Frame of Mind). As just mentioned, doing a two timing tour with a UK sibling band will be a trend that is less frequent due to the bill's implications |